Hi,
we're using FOP 0.25 / 0.92 in a tool which creates dynamic papers and
the same tool is used to create paper-based catalogs by using XEP as
renderer. XEP-> PDF -> Offset print...
The difference XEP / fop0.92 at our case is only the color handling (for
print we need CMYK and pantone colors, which fop does'nt support).
At fop 0.25 we must change some things like 0.92/XEP"content-width" <-->
"width"0.25 at images different.
But at all the switch is not so big.... just a few lines of xsl... it
depends on your layout...
Dirk
Pascal Sancho schrieb:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:24 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Commercial Processors
Is there any information available on how comparable fop is
in relation to commercial processors.
Has anyone switched from one to the other?
thanks as always
Andyr
Hi Andy,
Here [1] was a very old camparison page between FOP 0.20.5 and
commercial tools.
It is very far from current reality, but it exists...
[1] http://www.antennahouse.com/xslfo/axf3fo.htm
Pascal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
