Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Just FYI, FOP Trunk and FOP 0.93 (when released) will not always throw > an exception anymore in this case. It reacts depending on the overflow > property, so for the default case, the page will simply overflow. Note > that FOP interprets keep with the value "always" so that it may not > break the content apart in any case. DocBook should generate an integer > value for the keep property to allow breaking in difficult situations > but that isn't implemented, yet.
I have also proposed in the DocBook mailing list the integer property. But they want to keep to always. Don't know why, because this results always for large content in an overflow. Integer seems to be much better. Karsten > > On 12.10.2006 21:47:18 Karsten Ohme wrote: > >>Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> >>>Hi Karsten, >>> >>><snip/> >>> >>>>>>>>The content does not fit on the page, it must be continued on the next >>>>>>>>page. >>>>>>>>I want, that the content is continued on the next page and no error is >>>>>>>>thrown. Why does it not work? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It looks like you want to process pre-formatted text. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>I suspect >>>>>>>there is a line too long to fit the available horizontal space. >>>>>> >>>>>>No. Vertical space. If a line is too long it is simply going over the >>>>>>border. If I separate the block into many blocks, everything works. But >>>>>>this must be done by hand, this would be really really really cruel. >>>>> >>>>>Can you please post a stripped down version of your fo file that >>>>>reproduces the problem? >>>> >>>>The source is a DocBook file. I tried to translate the fo file. With fop >>>>0.20.5 it works. Test2.pdf is the output. With fop 0.92 it doesn't. >>> >>> >>>The problem is caused by a keep-together.within-column="always" in the >>>fo:block surrounding the block that contains the "Beispiel 1.1 Example" >>>string. Removing that attribute solves the problem. This works with Fop >>>0.20.5 simply because keep-together was not entirely supported in that >>>version. >>> >>>I guess that the keep-together attribute is put by the template handling >>>the <example> DocBook element. In that case you would have to customize >>>that template to remove the attribute. Perhaps there is already a >>>parameter for that in the DocBook XSLT stylesheets. >>> >>>If you have problems customizing the stylesheets then you will find help >>>on the docbook-apps mailing list. >> >>Thanks, I will try it, it should do it. I will also report it to the >>DocBook mailing list, so that they can correct the stylesheet or reason, >>why it works this way. > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
