Hi, Kamal Bhatt a écrit : > >> >> After all this makes sense: we can imagine situations where the user >> prefers the content to be clipped rather than broken over two, e.g., >> pages. "always" allows for that. If the user simply wants the content to >> be broken only if it doesn't fit, they would choose an integer value. >> > An unfortunate side effect of this interpretation is that keep-together > is next to useless for most people as I suspect most people do not want > clipping and FOP doesn't support integers for keep-together (though I
I don't agree. The content will be clipped only if the whole block doesn't fit on a page alone, which is not that usual I think. If the content can fit by, e.g., starting a page then the paging algorithm will do so. > admit that is nothing more than opinion). Is it likely that FOP will > support integer values for keeps and breaks in the next couple of > versions? If not, would it be possible to make keep-together work the Oh, this is very probable that integer values will be supported in a couple of versions. Question is, when will those versions be released ;-) > way most people seem to think it will work if you specify an integer? > (ie an integer would cause it to work in the way most people think > always should) Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
