That's interesting. And if I told you, that what FOP 0.20.5 produces is also Level 2? There are quite a few Level 2 operations used in the PostScript renderer there. It would be interesting to know what exactly this fax software is and if it's really just a Level 1 implementation maybe with some Level 2 extensions or if it contains a buggy Level 2 implementation.
But then, you say you're using a fax software. Wouldn't it be an alternative to use TIFF instead? Jeremias Maerki On 10.10.2007 15:47:37 Johannes Katelaan wrote: > Yes - kind of. I'm using fax software that takes postscript files as > input. > If I generate these files using fop 0.20.5 they work fine. If I > generate the files using fop 0.94, no way! > I really don't know, what exactly makes the difference. But with > Level 1 Postscript I would be sure, that it works. > Anyway, I have to stick to fop 0.20.5 then. > > Thanks for the info! > > Johannes > > Am 10.10.2007 um 15:31 schrieb Jeremias Maerki: > > > PostScript Level 1 is not supported. It would require considerable > > effort to map all the various features into Level 1. Are you still > > working with 20 year old printers or why do you need Level 1? > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > > > On 10.10.2007 15:08:27 Johannes Katelaan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> perhaps somebody can help me answering the following question: > >> > >> Is there a way to force fop 0.94 to generate Level 1 PostScript? > >> > >> I tried to set language-level in the configuration file. But this > >> seems to have no effect at all. > >> > >> Johannes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
