On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:29 +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > At first glance, it seems to be something that applies to > "accessibility" of information in general (is not restricted to > printed media).
Yes. It would be better to make the information available in the PDF available in other formats as well. This was kind of the point of XML and XSL: provide your information via multiple channels. > Note that the 'Common Accessibility' properties, as defined by the > XSL Rec, are for the largest part unimplemented in FOP at the moment. I’m honestly not sure what FOP would do with them, anyway. A single XSL stylesheet might say that emphasis should be both bold and loud, but I would expect a print formatter to ignore the loudness just as I would expect an audio formatter to ignore the boldness. ~Chris -- Chris Maden, text nerd <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ > “Metonymy and synecdoche don’t do the fighting and dying, the soldiers and the townspeople do.” —John Crowley, _Endless Things_ GnuPG Fingerprint: C6E4 E2A9 C9F8 71AC 9724 CAA3 19F8 6677 0077 C319 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
