Andreas, Thanks for your reply.. Indeed putting keep-together.within-page="always" on the fo:block for which I want to preserve the linefeed does the trick. Does not seem logical however...this behavior has been introduced in recent updates to the trunk (somewhere between jan 20 and yesterday morning).
Attached is an FO: -First example block linefeed is preserved (outside table) -Second block, linefeed is not preserved (inside table) -third block, linefeed is preserved (inside table and using the suggestion from Andreas, adding the keep-together.within-page="always") Is this the correct behavior? Tx., Raphael -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2008 18:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem On Jan 25, 2008, at 16:38, Raphael Parree wrote: Hi > With the current version from the trunk the linefeed-treatment > preserve on a block in a table cell does not seem to work. The > enclosed fo file illustrates this. > > There was a recent post about this, IIRC... Try substituting 'keep-together="always"' with 'keep-together.within- page="always"'. The explanation keep-together="always" is semantically equivalent to keep-together.within-page="always", keep-together.within- column="always" *and* keep-together.within-line="always" I'm not sure whether it is compliant behavior that a keep.within-line overrules preserved linefeeds, but that is what happens right now. HTH! Cheers Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linefeed-treatment.fo
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
