Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 14:17, paul womack wrote:
O.K.
I've found this documentation on the "area tree" internal modelling:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/design/areas.html
I think this page:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/intermediate.html
says that the XML format is "subject to change".
q1) May I assume that any particular version of FOP would be able
to consume an area tree (XML) that it had itself generated?
That's a reasonable assumption, I think.
(I have noted your other information; thank you)
This assumption may be reasonable, but it just failed
a test (I think)
generating tiff directly:
../fop -dpi 288 -xsl lineage.xsl -xml lineage_eg.xml -tiff a.tif
gives me different line breaks to going via an "at" file:
../fop -xsl lineage.xsl -xml lineage_eg.xml -at lineage.at.xml; ../fop -atin
lineage.at.xml -dpi 288 -tiff b.tif
Unless these are different for a "valid" reason that I am ignorant of?
The "b.tif" files has lines going beyond the right hand side of
the raster; the lines appears to have been wrapped for a large
page width than I (actually) have.
BugBear
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
