Could have been a regression introduced by my refactoring the handling of block-containers between 0.94 and 0.95beta. The case wasn't covered in our test suite. I've committed a fix to the 0.95 branch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663482&view=rev http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_95
The problem was that the flow area didn't generate a real reference area (i.e. a new coordinate system). Please note that the width="100%" will still (i.e. like in 0.94) return a value that may not exactly be what you need for such a column separator. I don't think there's any construct in XSL-FO that allows you to express that properly. FO-Implementations like AntennaHouse have proprietary extension for that. On 04.06.2008 22:14:56 _zachary_ wrote: > > It is a column separator, however the line flows over the text in 0.95 > e.g. fop0.95 > > This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh > | > | > > e.g fop0.94 > This is some test content! blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! blah blah balh balh > This is some test content! blah blah balh balh > | > | > | > | > | > | > > So how would i get this to work in 0.95? the left position isn't what > matters its the floating over the text when i span all that matters. > > thank you for your help and time. I really appreciate it > > > Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: > > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote: > > > > Hi > > > >> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not > >> float over > >> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or > >> something that > >> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to > >> get the > >> same results that 0.94 returns? > > > > For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that > > 9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto > > width) minus 1.4in (margins). > > If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the > > intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a > > visual column-separator (?) > > > > For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously > > hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would > > require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take > > that into account when painting the areas. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Andreas > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17655634.html > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
