Sweet thank you, so can i download the binary from somewhere or do i have to do a checkout from the svn repo?
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote: > > Could have been a regression introduced by my refactoring the handling > of block-containers between 0.94 and 0.95beta. The case wasn't covered > in our test suite. I've committed a fix to the 0.95 branch: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663482&view=rev > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_95 > > The problem was that the flow area didn't generate a real reference area > (i.e. a new coordinate system). > > Please note that the width="100%" will still (i.e. like in 0.94) return > a value that may not exactly be what you need for such a column > separator. I don't think there's any construct in XSL-FO that allows you > to express that properly. FO-Implementations like AntennaHouse have > proprietary extension for that. > > On 04.06.2008 22:14:56 _zachary_ wrote: >> >> It is a column separator, however the line flows over the text in 0.95 >> e.g. fop0.95 >> >> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! | blah blah balh balh >> | >> | >> >> e.g fop0.94 >> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh >> This is some test content! blah blah balh balh >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> >> So how would i get this to work in 0.95? the left position isn't what >> matters its the floating over the text when i span all that matters. >> >> thank you for your help and time. I really appreciate it >> >> >> Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: >> > >> > On Jun 3, 2008, at 20:52, _zachary_ wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> >> I have this test fo file. In FOP 0.94 the vertical line does not >> >> float over >> >> the content, and in FOP 0.95b it does. Is this some fix or >> >> something that >> >> was implemented into 0.95 or something? If so is there any way to >> >> get the >> >> same results that 0.94 returns? >> > >> > For the first block of text, the overlap is caused by the fact that >> > 9.3cm is more than half the region-body width, which is 8.26in (auto >> > width) minus 1.4in (margins). >> > If you reduce 'left' to roughly 8.7cm, it will more closely match the >> > intended outcome, if I interpret correctly: the line is meant as a >> > visual column-separator (?) >> > >> > For the second block, I'm not sure what has changed that previously >> > hid the line behind blocks with span='all'. In theory, this would >> > require using the z-index property, but AFAIK, FOP does not yet take >> > that into account when painting the areas. >> > >> > >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Andreas >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17655634.html >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.94-AND-0.95b-tp17630414p17672698.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
