Actually, you forgot to attach the FO file (or it got stripped at some
point). Anyway, I can only point you to:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/output.html#rtf
I've already updated the documentation on the RTF limitations a few days
ago, but those updates aren't live, yet. Just to replicate the
information here:
These are some known restrictions compared to other supported output formats
(not a complete list):
* Not supported/implemented:
o break-before/after (supported by the RTF library but not tied into
the RTFHandler)
o fo:page-number-citation-last
o keeps (supported by the RTF library but not tied into the
RTFHandler)
o region-start/end (RTF limitation)
o multiple columns
* Only a single page-master is supported
* Not all variations of fo:leader are supported (RTF limitation)
* percentages are not supported everywhere
Depending on what you're trying to do tweaking the FO won't help you.
Even "tweaking the Java code" ;-) might not help as many FO features
cannot be mapped to RTF. Basically, I don't recommend RTF production for
anything else than relatively simple documents. The limitations are too
severe.
On 09.07.2008 15:09:50 Paul Hunnisett wrote:
> I've written an FO document that I need to convert into and RTF file. It
> comes through the transform all messed up looking (sorry - best
> description!). If I transform it into a PDF then it looks perfect, but the
> RTF looks awful.
>
> I've attached the original fo, the PDF and the RTF output so that you can
> see what I'm aiming for and what I'm getting...
>
> I'm assuming the problem is to do with fo features not supported in the RTF
> transform. Is anyone aware of a way that I can tweak my fo to get the
> desired results in a way that will work?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul Hunnisett
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
