Looking at the source code it appears as if only the "height" on fo:table-row is inspected. The right property would actually be "block-progression-dimension" since "height" is mapped to "block-progression-dimension", but that's the way it looks right now. I haven't run any tests, but you might want to try specifying the height on the parent table-row of a cell. If that doesn't help you'll need to dive into the RTF spec and the FOP source code. The RTF command to look up is "trrh".
On 15.07.2008 12:38:42 Paul Hunnisett wrote: > OK - this is almost looking how I want it to after playing around with > tables and I've upgraded to 0.95 as well. > > However, I'm still havign one problem with inserting whitespace into the RTF > - specifically, line breaks. I have empty table cells that need to be a > certian height, but they are displayed in the RTF reduced down to one line > high. > > Does anyone know how I can resolve/workaround this? > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Paul Hunnisett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Brilliant - thanks, I'll give that a go... > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> If you change the list to a table and use absolute values for > >> column-width in the table you should be fine. The latter problem has > >> been fixed recently in the 0.95 branch: > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_95 > >> > >> HTH > >> > >> On 09.07.2008 16:31:28 Paul Hunnisett wrote: > >> > I've tried attaching the fo again. > >> > > >> > All I want to do is a simple document. It has some text, a simple list > >> and > >> > a simple table. At present I have no option other than RTF - unless I > >> go > >> > back and say that it can't be done... > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Actually, you forgot to attach the FO file (or it got stripped at some > >> > > point). Anyway, I can only point you to: > >> > > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/output.html#rtf > >> > > I've already updated the documentation on the RTF limitations a few > >> days > >> > > ago, but those updates aren't live, yet. Just to replicate the > >> > > information here: > >> > > These are some known restrictions compared to other supported output > >> > > formats (not a complete list): > >> > > > >> > > * Not supported/implemented: > >> > > o break-before/after (supported by the RTF library but not > >> tied > >> > > into the RTFHandler) > >> > > o fo:page-number-citation-last > >> > > o keeps (supported by the RTF library but not tied into the > >> > > RTFHandler) > >> > > o region-start/end (RTF limitation) > >> > > o multiple columns > >> > > * Only a single page-master is supported > >> > > * Not all variations of fo:leader are supported (RTF limitation) > >> > > * percentages are not supported everywhere > >> > > > >> > > Depending on what you're trying to do tweaking the FO won't help you. > >> > > Even "tweaking the Java code" ;-) might not help as many FO features > >> > > cannot be mapped to RTF. Basically, I don't recommend RTF production > >> for > >> > > anything else than relatively simple documents. The limitations are > >> too > >> > > severe. > >> > > > >> > > On 09.07.2008 15:09:50 Paul Hunnisett wrote: > >> > > > I've written an FO document that I need to convert into and RTF > >> file. It > >> > > > comes through the transform all messed up looking (sorry - best > >> > > > description!). If I transform it into a PDF then it looks perfect, > >> but > >> > > the > >> > > > RTF looks awful. > >> > > > > >> > > > I've attached the original fo, the PDF and the RTF output so that > >> you can > >> > > > see what I'm aiming for and what I'm getting... > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm assuming the problem is to do with fo features not supported in > >> the > >> > > RTF > >> > > > transform. Is anyone aware of a way that I can tweak my fo to get > >> the > >> > > > desired results in a way that will work? > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheers > >> > > > > >> > > > Paul Hunnisett > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Jeremias Maerki > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> Jeremias Maerki > >> Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
