> Hi, > > Like you noticed the resolution only applies to images. I am slightly > puzzled by the way you compare both outputs: are you putting the sheet > of paper next to the screen and looking for differences?
I have a table with fixed-size width and a large chunk of text inside (so that is wraps). When I test the HTML file all major browsers (Safari,Chrome,Firefox,Opera,Explorer) wrap at a specific word (i.e. the third) and the output is the same on-screen for all of them. The resulting PDF file however wraps at a different word (i.e. the second) even though everything else is the same (text contents, font size,font, e.t.c.). When I print the HTML and PDF files the text is printed with exactly the same font size and the only difference is the text wrapping. All of this in the same physical machine (winXP 32bit and FOP 0.95), so screen resolution and OS are also the same. It seems to me that fixed-width in tables are 96/72 dpi wider in PDF than in the HTML browser. Is there a reason why the calculations for fixed-width in tables produce a different result than ALL the other browsers? Is is possible to configure how these fixed-width calculations are performed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
