Hi Georg,

Georg Datterl wrote:
> Hi Vincent, hi everybody else,
> 
> Since the table problems from the thread "Strange table behaviour" have been 
> reduced to well known fop problems, I implemented everything I learned in 
> that thread and started a two-column layout (see fo file). Now the gap is 
> back, which I thought I got rid of when removing the break-before. 

There also is a tiny gap when the table is not broken. You must have
made mistakes when computing the sizes of the pink areas.

But this is not the only problem. There is a conditional space between
the two inner tables, that I guess fools the table algorithm the same
way as a forced break. If you set the conditionality of that space to
‘retain’ the gap disappears.


HTH,
Vincent

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to