Brad, instead of using keep-together.within-column="always", try keep-together.within-column="1". All integer values will be interpreted by FOP with the same strength, though. Full support for integer values is not available, yet. But at least this will allow the layout engine to break parts greater than one page apart if necessary. HTH
On 25.05.2010 21:02:41 Brad Smith wrote: > Hello, > > I have certain elements in my document which I would like to keep > together across pages as much as possible. I've been using the > keep-together (and keep-together.within-column) property for this, and > usually it works as expected: if printing the item on the current page > would cause it to spill over, a page-break is inserted before it. > Great. However, there are problems if the item's content is greater > than one page in length. In that case, it *still* stays on the same > page, even though that means all the content writing over its self, > resulting in gibberish. > > Is there a way to have a middle-ground? What I really want is "start > on a fresh page if it will keep the item from breaking, then keep > together /if possible/". > > Thanks in advance for any help people can offer. > --Brad Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
