Hi Brad, keep-together="always" doesn't work, because it's a short for three keeps, including keep-together.within-line, which you most likely don't want. Keep-together.within-column is the correct way. But "always" is too strong. Try keep-together.within-column="5". Numbers are not completely supported, but they are stronger than "none" and weaker than a page break. Works fine in my code.
Regards, Georg Datterl ------ Kontakt ------ Georg Datterl Geneon media solutions gmbh Gutenstetter Straße 8a 90449 Nürnberg HRB Nürnberg: 17193 Geschäftsführer: Yong-Harry Steiert Tel.: 0911/36 78 88 - 26 Fax: 0911/36 78 88 - 20 www.geneon.de Weitere Mitglieder der Willmy MediaGroup: IRS Integrated Realization Services GmbH: www.irs-nbg.de Willmy PrintMedia GmbH: www.willmy.de Willmy Consult & Content GmbH: www.willmycc.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Brad Smith [mailto:usernamenum...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010 23:05 An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Betreff: Re: keep-together.within-column with content > 1 page I've tried both. Same results either way. --Brad On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Amick, Eric <eric.am...@mail.house.gov> wrote: > Are you setting just keep-together.within-column? In my experience, the > unqualified keep-together (and unqualified keeps in general, for that > matter) rarely works successfully. > > Eric Amick Systems Engineer II > Legislative Computer Systems > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brad Smith [mailto:usernamenum...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 15:03 >> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> Subject: keep-together.within-column with content > 1 page >> >> Hello, >> >> I have certain elements in my document which I would like to keep >> together across pages as much as possible. I've been using the >> keep-together (and keep-together.within-column) property for this, and >> usually it works as expected: if printing the item on the current page >> would cause it to spill over, a page-break is inserted before it. >> Great. However, there are problems if the item's content is greater >> than one page in length. In that case, it *still* stays on the same >> page, even though that means all the content writing over its self, >> resulting in gibberish. >> >> Is there a way to have a middle-ground? What I really want is "start >> on a fresh page if it will keep the item from breaking, then keep >> together /if possible/". >> >> Thanks in advance for any help people can offer. >> --Brad >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > -- ~ Second Shift: An original, serialized audio adventure ~ http://www.secondshiftpodcast.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
