Hi Guys, Sorry to jump onto this so late in the game, but if you're trying to using TTF fonts with PostScript there is a branch called Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript which may help you. It allows you to embed TTFs in the PostScript which will mean you won't have to have the font installed on your printer and you can reference the font-file from your fop.xconf. If you have any issues I'd be more than happy to help.
Mehdi On 9 March 2011 21:24, Marquart, Joshua D <joshua.marqu...@firstdata.com> wrote: > The process that we have to take user-generated input and end up with a G4 > TIFF file. > > > > The current process is like this: > > > > 1 - We’ve got a front-end system that generates HTML from XSLT with a flag > for input purposes (input form fields are generated), or output style. > > 2 - Generated html is passed through a transformer with html_to_fo.xsl > applied to create XSL-FO data. > > 3a - Today, we take the resulting XSL-FO data and use FOP to generate a > PostScript file, which is sent to a legacy third party library that > transforms the PostScript into a beautiful near-identical G4 TIFF. > > > > For technical reasons, we have to stop using the third party library which > is both EOL and creates issues (the library does not ignore a console > shutdown signal and kills the service). > > > > 3b - Tomorrow, I’d like to just take the resulting XSL-FO data and generate > the G4 TIFF files using FOP (hence my TIFF-focused Buzilla contributions > 49695, 49696 and 50657) . > > > > At the moment, I’m just straight generating the TIFF from the XSL-FO data. > It mostly looks like the source, but for some reason the lesser fonts are a > lot lighter. > > > > It’s my understating that Fop is output-only when it comes to PostScript, > correct? > > > > For comparison purposes, I’m generating the PostScript and Tiff files as > flat files. > > Then I > > 1 - compare them side-by-side on the screen > > 2 - throw them both at a printer (and make sure the Tiff is sent through > PhotoShop and not shrunk to fit). > > > > The printouts line up physically, but the font for any 10pt in the Tiff is > much lighter (likely due to aliasing) than that produced with the > PostScript, or even that produced by a Tiff that has undergone the process > described in 3a above. > > > > With the “Oddly” comment quoted below, apparently the PostScript deferred to > “any,normal,400” and “any,normal,700” when confronted with > “Arial,normal,400”, which is not a big deal because my eventual goal is > removing the PostScript. > > > > -Josh > > > > From: Eric Douglas [mailto:edoug...@blockhouse.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:18 PM > > To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: RE: Font Weight > > > > 1. If it's actually printing the wrong font that's a different issue. We'd > have to see your font code for that. That would be everything in the font > tags in the xconf file if you're using one, or your font loading method if > you're using embedded code, plus the text in the fo which references the > font triplet values. > > 2. What do you mean by lightness? Are you using the PSRenderer and/or > TIFFRenderer to send output directly to a printer, to the same printer, back > to back? Are you somehow using both renderers to generate image files to > compare, or comparing something printed to something on the screen? Did you > use the PSRenderer to send output directly to a printer and the TIFFRenderer > to create an image file then send that image file to the printer? It sounds > like we need more details on what you're trying to do. It sounds like you > may be comparing apples to oranges. > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Marquart, Joshua D [mailto:joshua.marqu...@firstdata.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:07 PM > To: Glenn Adams > Cc: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: RE: Font Weight > > I was just doing research on this topic, came back here to supplement my > message with info, and saw you already beat me to it. > > > > Helpful method: getFontInfo().dumpAllTripletsToSystemOut() > > > > So… yes, I do not have fonts installed for font weights of 300, 500, etc. > and that would account for resolving to 400/700. > > > > The problem I’m seeing is when generating a PostScript and a Tiff from the > same xsl-fo file. > > The text generated in the Tiff (for the 400 weight) appears much lighter > than identical text in the PostScript and is likely due to using the > Java2DRenderer vs. the PsRenderer. > > > > Oddly, when I set the font to Arial in the xsl-fo: > > - the font in the resulting PostScript appears Times Roman > > - the font in the resulting Tiff is identical to the font used in the Tiff > when Helvetica was specified. > > > > Other than hunting down, installing and registering a weight 500 or so font > for Helvetica or Arial (where might I find one? No idea.), are there other > options that might I employ to lessen the lightness of the 400-weight ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Josh > > > > From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 12:02 PM > To: Marquart, Joshua D > Cc: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: Font Weight > > > > Josh, > > > > What you have not said yet is whether you actually have (on your system) a > font with the desired weight or not. Specifically, do you actually have > installed multiple font instances with the distinct weights you wish to > reference? If you do not, then it doesn't do much good to discuss referring > to them. > > > > On the other hand, if you do have distinct faces with weights 300, 500, 600, > 800, 900, etc., installed, then it is merely a matter of ensuring that the > reference in your FO file correctly maps to the associated font instance. > That can be handled in different ways. > > > > So please answer whether you do have the fonts installed in the first place > with these weights. > > > > G. > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Marquart, Joshua D > <joshua.marqu...@firstdata.com> wrote: > > “FOP does not synthesize fonts with different weights. You need to supply > the fonts with the weights you specify in FO content.” > > > > I understand Fop doesn’t synthesize the weights. I understand that it has > two specific built-in weights (700 and 400) that are being used to replace > other weights per the following: > > > > When I set-up using a Java2DRenderer and specify the following FO content > snippets: > > > > <fo:table-cell font-size="10pt" font-family="Helvetica"><fo:block > line-height="13pt"> > > <fo:block white-space-collapse="true"> > > <fo:inline font-weight="900">900 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="800">800 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="700">700 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="600">600 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="500">500 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="400">400 Weight </fo:inline> > > … > > <fo:inline font-weight="300">300 Weight </fo:inline> > > </fo:block></fo:block></fo:table-cell> > > … > > > > the logger gives me the following information: > > > > WARNING: Font "Helvetica,normal,900" not found. Substituting with > "Helvetica,normal,700". > > WARNING: Font "Helvetica,normal,800" not found. Substituting with > "Helvetica,normal,700". > > WARNING: Font "Helvetica,normal,600" not found. Substituting with > "Helvetica,normal,700". > > WARNING: Font "Helvetica,normal,500" not found. Substituting with > "Helvetica,normal,400". > > WARNING: Font "Helvetica,normal,300" not found. Substituting with > "Helvetica,normal,400". > > > > So I would need to supply very specific replacement fonts for > Helvetica,normal,900 ( and 800-300, not counting 400)? > > (Same as above when replacing Helvetica with Arial). > > > > I DO understand the following: > > > > 1- that per the current specs, item 7.9.9 for font-weight has a “TODO > <relative> font weights” message. > > 2 - that per the current build, the font classes generated from > Helvetica.xml and HelveticaBold.xml are used for 400 and 700 respectively > > 3 - that per the fuzzy replacement, 700 is used for 900-600 and 400 is used > for 500-100(probably). > > > > So my questions still stand > > 1 - is there a simpler way to use / access / apply a darker 500 or 600 > weight Helvetica and if so, what’s the best process to handle it given the > codebase? > > 2 - should I instead render a “Helvetica500.xml” and generate the > appropriate font class; obviously since that’s not yet been done with the > existing fop codebase, it is probably a lot more work than needed. > > 3 - Any other option I should pursue? > > > > If there is a process started to handle item 7.9.9, I would be happy to > pitch in and help, I am just not certain where to start. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Josh > > > > > > From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:40 PM > To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Cc: Marquart, Joshua D > Subject: Re: Font Weight > > > > FOP does not synthesize fonts with different weights. You need to supply the > fonts with the weights you specify in FO content. > > > > Regards, > > Glenn > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Marquart, Joshua D > <joshua.marqu...@firstdata.com> wrote: > > I have a question about Font Weight. > > > > We’re using Helvetica and using FOP to take the FO file and generate it as > both (1) a PostScript file and (2) a TIFF file. > > > > Additionally, we are able to use third-party software to take the PostScript > file and convert it directly to a second TIFF file (for comparison reasons). > > > > Of course, the fonts on the TIFF from FOP are a little pixilated and the > “normal” font could stand to be rendered a bit darker. > > > > I am using Helvetica and tried to set the font-weight to 500 or 600, but it > gets replaced with weight 400, which is apparently the “normal” Helvetica > font registered in the system. > > Font-weight Bold and values of 800 and 900 use the “bold” Helvetica which is > weight 700. > > > > Is there an easy way to use / access a darker 500 or 600 weight Helvetica, > or possibly render the or am I really sunk here? > > > > I’ve already extended the Java2DRenderer, for my own purposes. > > > > The following Graphics2D rendering hints don’t seem to do much when > included: > > > > graphics.setRenderingHint(RenderingHints.KEY_FRACTIONALMETRICS, > RenderingHints.VALUE_FRACTIONALMETRICS_ON); > > graphics.setRenderingHint(RenderingHints.KEY_ANTIALIASING, > RenderingHints.VALUE_ANTIALIAS_ON); > > graphics.setRenderingHint(RenderingHints.KEY_TEXT_ANTIALIASING, > RenderingHints.VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_ON); > > graphics.setRenderingHint(RenderingHints.KEY_RENDERING, > RenderingHints.VALUE_RENDER_QUALITY); > > graphics.setRenderingHint(RenderingHints.KEY_STROKE_CONTROL, > RenderingHints.VALUE_STROKE_PURE); > > > > Suggestions would be very helpful. > > > > Much thanks, > > > > Josh > > > > ________________________________ > > The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message > to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify First Data > immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. > > ________________________________ > > The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message > to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify First Data > immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
