The spec for XSL-FO is the spec. It is up to you to translate from your XML design language into XSL-FO.
G. On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Theresa Jayne Forster <[email protected] > wrote: > The problem is that the Designers specify it must be HEAVY not BOLD and > they have no understanding of the numeric weights. > > > > The designers use light, normal, bold, heavy and black > > > > The current FOP only supports normal and bold. > > > > I guess I will need to make sure that the fop I use is modded to support > the black and heavy as well as light. > > > > > > Kindest regards > > > > > Theresa Forster > > Senior Software Developer > > *From:* Eric Douglas [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 02 June 2011 16:03 > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: Problems since upgrading, > > > > heavy is not a standard keyword. > > If you select the wrong value for the fonts you have loaded it should log a > warning for font replacement. > > Keywords translate to specific numbers. > > You would want to use the numbers instead of the words to be sure it's > always correct. > > They might think light is 200 but your light font has a weight of 100, or > normal 300 / 400 etc. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/fonts.html#font-boldness > > Standard keywords are normal (400) and bold (700), and lighter / bolder > (relative to parent). > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Theresa Jayne Forster [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:46 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Problems since upgrading, > > Since upgrading the fop I use from 0.23 to 1.0 I am now getting problems > > One of which is that the font designations I used to use are now no longer > possible, and was wondering why this has seemingly changed, and is there > plans to support the method I am used to using? > > > > Before <fo:block font-family=”Frutiger” font-style=”normal” > font-weight=”heavy”/> > > > > Now apparently I need to do weight as a number 700=bold etc > > > > Kindest regards > > > > > Theresa Forster > > Senior Software Developer > > > ------------------------------ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3662 - Release Date: 05/26/11 >
