yes, I see the problem. it is indeed strange but I think it is the
result of the fact that each cell is painted independently and even
though they touch each other (the common edges of adjacent cells have
exactly the same coordinates) the viewer (and apparently your printer)
create an "artificial" line in between.
maybe this will need to be revisited one day... in any case, in your
particular example you probably can get around the problem by doing
things differently. maybe putting the background color in the side
region instead of giving a background color to the cells of the table.
On 11/8/12 11:03 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
Hopefully this latest one is more direct.
On 11/08/2012 04:00 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
what i said about maximally minimizing your test FO; when you don't
do so, you lead devs astray
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rob Sargent <rsarg...@xmission.com
<mailto:rsarg...@xmission.com>> wrote:
Please find attached a new fo which defines the sidebar for the
left pages only. The blue column will show the four lines
separating each row, at least in Evince 3.4.0 (using
poppler/cairo(0.18.4))
On 11/08/2012 03:19 PM, Luis Bernardo wrote:
Rob, I looked with more time at this issue and I think that my
previous statement that I was seeing lines where they should not
be was incorrect. I think they should be there because they are
in the *fo source!
It is true that no lines appear with Adobe, but they are visible
both with Mac's Preview and Linux's Evince. But the lines are
only in the column that does not spans rows, the one with the
blue background. I do not see them in the column that spans
rows. More than that I do not see any unexpected drawing
commands in the PDF source.
Can you please explain again what lines are you seeing in the
printer output? Are they in the blue column or in the white column?
On 11/8/12 5:40 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
We use iText as well as FOP in producing our printable
product. Some pages get a black background from iText (certain
graphics look better that way). When the black background is
under the sidebar (as made with the referenced sidebar.fo
<http://sidebar.fo>) the nuisance-some inter-cell lines expose
the black underlay. (Our fix is to not put the black under the
sidebar.)
In the original thread Jeremias Maerki wrote
I suspect it's once
more Adobe's anti-aliasing to be blamed. And this won't
show up in print,
BTW. To get rid of this on display, go to Acrobat's
Preferences Dialog,
select "Page Display" and enable "Enhance Thin Lines" (AR
X) or disable
"Smooth line Art". You may have to disable "Use 2D graphics
acceleration",
too. Nothing FOP can do at the moment. I've recently
explained on this
list what would need to be done to work around "Adobe's
problem".
Since there is a path whereon they do show up in print, I
wonder if this suggested work-around should be revisited? It's
not clear to me that this is still out of FOP's hands?
Thank you for your indulgence,
rjs
On 11/05/2012 05:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
remove elements/attrs until the problem goes away and only
comes back when adding the element/attr just removed (no
matter what else is removed)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Rob Sargent
<rsarg...@xmission.com <mailto:rsarg...@xmission.com>> wrote:
I have reviewed the sidebar.fo <http://sidebar.fo> and it
really cannot be substantially reduced. It simply fills
the "outer edge" of our pages - region-start or region end
- with a narrow two-column, five-row table stretching the
length of the page. The inner column is just spacer and
the outer column gets the section name(s) and number, a
rule and a page number. The names are supplied in a
rotated svg (not included).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
