Your screen capture is not half an inch, so we don't know where the scaling comes from. Have you tried to zoom in with your PDF viewer?
If you still have questions please provide original image, your fo file, any fop.xconf if using it, and the generated pdf. I was unable to reproduce the issue you describe with a stock png image. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Lauri Kasanen <c...@gmx.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Picture of the issue: http://i43.tinypic.com/2hq4ilf.png > > I use 256x256 PNG admonition images. They are specced in the generated .fo > file as having content-width of 36 pt, which is half an inch I understand. > At a target DPI of 300, this would be 150x150. > > As you can see in the pic, it's obvious FOP uses a poor quality image > scaling algorithm, nearest-neighbor, or point sampling in GL terms. > > How can I tell FOP to use a better quality algorithm? Ideally at least > bicubic, but bilinear would be a great improvement too. > > Thanks, > - Lauri > > PS: Please CC me, not subscribed. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
