Hi, generally speaking, FOP prior 0.9x was widely buggy, regarding block-progression-dimension (AKA height) related things. Current FOP versions (since refactoring started with 0.9x) gives expected results. In addition, older versions didn't fully respect XSL-FO recommendations. So you'll get substantial benefits upgrading FOP 0.2x to latest release (currently 1.1).
2015-02-16 14:05 GMT+01:00 fop_ag <nithinurs.venugopalraj...@arisglobal.com>: > Hi Pascal, > > Will check this solution.. > But one doubt , y with newer fop version it stopped working in expected way > ? > In older version it was working properly.. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Re-Fixing-the-table-height-tp41699p41772.html > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > -- pascal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
