fingers too big ... That said, I'm not sure that fixed table height will be implemented in short-term; the main question is: how distribute remaining vertical space between rows.
2015-02-17 8:47 GMT+01:00 Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > generally speaking, FOP prior 0.9x was widely buggy, regarding > block-progression-dimension (AKA height) related things. Current FOP > versions (since refactoring started with 0.9x) gives expected results. > In addition, older versions didn't fully respect XSL-FO > recommendations. So you'll get substantial benefits upgrading FOP 0.2x > to latest release (currently 1.1). > > 2015-02-16 14:05 GMT+01:00 fop_ag <nithinurs.venugopalraj...@arisglobal.com>: >> Hi Pascal, >> >> Will check this solution.. >> But one doubt , y with newer fop version it stopped working in expected way >> ? >> In older version it was working properly.. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Re-Fixing-the-table-height-tp41699p41772.html >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> > > > > -- > pascal -- pascal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
