Are you saying I need to create my own fop runner to do such a thing? It can't be done using the regular fop script?
Seems like an unfortunate design choice. Or maybe I'm missing something... I always thought the fop script was the primary method of using fop, but perhaps I'm wrong. /Oskar 2016-05-26 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jeremias Maerki <d...@jeremias-maerki.ch>: > See http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/2.1/events.html for an example of > exactly that. > > HTH > Jeremias Maerki > > > On 12.05.2016 23:12:22 Oskar Berggren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > Sometimes a document will reference an image that FOP is unable to find. > With FOP 2.0, it will print a SEVERE log and then continue processing the > file, eventually exiting with a regular zero exit code. > > > > > > Because there may be a significant amount of other logs, and because > this FOP was invoked from a makefile that renders a bunch of documents, > it's easy to miss the log about the missing image. And because FOP appears > to not use a non-zero exit code, the make command will also not complain. > > > > > > How can I make FOP scream louder on missing images (and perhaps also > other errors)? It could complete processing the file, but crucially I would > like it to exit with a non-zero exit code so that make will stop with an > error message. > > > > > > > > /Oskar > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
