All,
It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version that could be used with 2.3. 
Right now I am stuck with FOP 2.2 because of this change. Right now I don’t see 
any other way to support MathML natively like jEuclid in FOP without a lot of 
rework.

Has anyone tested https://github.com/rototor/jeuclid ?

Regards,
Dean Nelson


From: Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:32 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid

Hi,

In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace 
since we don’t own org.w3c.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1216

Thanks

From: Maxime Bégnis <max...@neodoc.fr<mailto:max...@neodoc.fr>>
Sent: 26 March 2019 08:21
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid


Hello,

There is an incompatibility between FOP 2.3 and JEuclid 3.1.9. This because FOP 
uses Batik 1.10.

The class "org.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.8 has be moved to 
"org.apache.batik.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.10.

That's the problem I could spot but I don't know if there are others.

I modified and recompile JEuclid core simply changing the import statement in 
net.sourceforge.jeuclid.elements.presentation.token.Mo and that fixed the issue 
but I didn't make any intensive test yet. Attached is the patch.

Is that a known issue? If so, is there a well known way to fix it?

Thanks,
--
--
NeoDoc
Maxime Bégnis
max...@neodoc.fr<mailto:max...@neodoc.fr>
Tél: +33 (0)4.42.52.24.20
789 Rue de La Gare
13770 Venelles
France
http://www.neodoc.fr/

Reply via email to