Hi,
The developer of JEuclid will need to be contacted to update their code to work with the newer batik. Thanks From: Dean Nelson <dnel...@metriguard.com> Sent: 26 March 2019 16:38 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid All, It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version that could be used with 2.3. Right now I am stuck with FOP 2.2 because of this change. Right now I don’t see any other way to support MathML natively like jEuclid in FOP without a lot of rework. Has anyone tested https://github.com/rototor/jeuclid ? Regards, Dean Nelson From: Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com <mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:32 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org <mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid Hi, In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace since we don’t own org.w3c. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1216 Thanks From: Maxime Bégnis <max...@neodoc.fr <mailto:max...@neodoc.fr> > Sent: 26 March 2019 08:21 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org <mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid Hello, There is an incompatibility between FOP 2.3 and JEuclid 3.1.9. This because FOP uses Batik 1.10. The class "org.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.8 has be moved to "org.apache.batik.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.10. That's the problem I could spot but I don't know if there are others. I modified and recompile JEuclid core simply changing the import statement in net.sourceforge.jeuclid.elements.presentation.token.Mo and that fixed the issue but I didn't make any intensive test yet. Attached is the patch. Is that a known issue? If so, is there a well known way to fix it? Thanks, -- -- NeoDoc Maxime Bégnis max...@neodoc.fr <mailto:max...@neodoc.fr> Tél: +33 (0)4.42.52.24.20 789 Rue de La Gare 13770 Venelles France http://www.neodoc.fr/
