On 28/07/16 13:08, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:48:07AM -0400, Stephen Benjamin wrote: >> 2 users yesterday at the meet-up in DC specifically asked about this, and >> were rather surprised by the decision. They have some long-running instances >> of Foreman and they want to have more time to get them off EL6, and >> continuing >> to get updates (esp. security issues) was important for them. Considering >> 75%+ of Foreman users run on EL, it's no surprise EL6 still makes up a big >> part of the user base. > > I believe that at the Nuremburg meetup there were a few users on EL6 as > well, but they mostly cared about supporting EL6 clients (through > provisioning) which will be supported for a long time. > > That said, I believe security updates are the most important to them so > you could consider supporting the last release on EL6 a bit longer. I > don't know how much of a time/effort difference that makes compared to > supporting it longer on the newest release.
Yeah, I can certainly try for a bit longer if it's useful to people, though help doing the backports may be appreciated when we get there. -- Dominic Cleal domi...@cleal.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
