On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: > On 8 August 2016 at 15:41, Ohad Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Eric D Helms <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This thread has seen a revival with many points being made on both sides. > >> However, things have gone cold for nearly a week now and there are > >> processes and decisions that hinge on the outcome with respect to users and > >> developers alike. Are we to assume that what has been done is done and this > >> discussion is moot? Some finality in this matter would be greatly > >> appreciated to either continue forward with EL6 builds and preparing all of > >> our ecosystem users for the 1.14 release to migrate or beginning now to > >> tell users they are SOL and to start testing transition and migration while > >> we work out and test the best way for them to do so. > >> > > > > I strongly prefer deprecating EL6 with Foreman 1.14, and would ask to > > revert the el6 changes in nighties. > > > > I did ask previously to confirm if the cons to keeping EL6 were still as > simple as suggested on May 10th. I've heard no contradiction of that, so my > preference also goes to reverting the change in the nightlies.
Supporting EL6 is little effort for the projects I'm involved so I have no objections to formally deprecating EL6 on 1.13 and dropping support in 1.14. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
