On 29/07/16 10:29, Michael Moll wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 08:35:36AM +0100, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote: >> I have at least one feature planned for smart-proxy that requires >> dependencies not available on 1.8.7 (at all). At this point converting >> the smart-proxy to use SCL isn’t worth it, and it would be great not >> to have an additional 3-months wait. > > That would be exactly my point also, as I said in my mail for the > original discussion back then: If the support for EL6 is prolonged, the > proxy (and maybe even the installer) should really get into SCL, which > is definitely too much work for just 3 or 6 months. If EL6 support is > really needed, somebody[tm] needs to do that work, but then we could > also extend the lifespan not only some months, but probably some years.
The latest software collection updates aren't available on EL6 either, so more reliance on packaging into SCLs doesn't help in the medium to long term. -- Dominic Cleal [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
