I think having everything under one tree makes sense. Long-term, the goal is to turn Katello to not feel like a separate project, but rather an extension.
+1 Of course I'm not aware of some possible consequences if there are any? -- Ivan On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Tom McKay <[email protected]> wrote: > As we try to work towards better bugzilla and redmine component definitions > and relations, I keep finding myself wishing I could use redmine for both > foreman and katello issues together. > > For example, several dev teams are experimenting with redmine "versions" for > their sprints[1]. I don't think that a single version can include issues > from both foreman and katello projects. If katello was a subproject of > foreman, though, then teams could bring any issue into their sprint view. > > Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we combine? > > [1] > http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/roadmap#Team_Ivan_Iteration_1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "foreman-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
