+1 for moving into Foreman project subtree -- Marek
On Tuesday 02 of August 2016 17:36:53 Ivan Necas wrote: > I think having everything under one tree makes sense. Long-term, the > goal is to turn > Katello to not feel like a separate project, but rather an extension. > > +1 > > Of course I'm not aware of some possible consequences if there are any? > > -- Ivan > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Tom McKay <[email protected]> wrote: > > As we try to work towards better bugzilla and redmine component > > definitions > > and relations, I keep finding myself wishing I could use redmine for both > > foreman and katello issues together. > > > > For example, several dev teams are experimenting with redmine "versions" > > for their sprints[1]. I don't think that a single version can include > > issues from both foreman and katello projects. If katello was a > > subproject of foreman, though, then teams could bring any issue into > > their sprint view. > > > > Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we > > combine? > > > > [1] > > http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/roadmap#Team_Ivan_Iteratio > > n_1 > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "foreman-dev" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
