On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Michael K. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:04:35PM +0100, Mark Trompell wrote: >> How much time would you think will it keep to get on track? > So, "get on track" is where the unknown work is. We don't know how > much work it will take to adapt to all the recent Fedora changes. > Dick has two proposed patches that he's pointed to (thanks) that we > need to look at, though I don't know whether the test suite works > with them. This part is where I want to propose joint work between > Foresight developers and SAS developers. > After that, updates are usually not a big problem. Just run a robot > to run mirrorball, and occasionally it fails and imports stop until > someone figures out why and fixes it. Sometimes the required changes > are to the factories that drive the import process; more often, the > safety checks in mirrorball have flagged a possible inconsistency > that has to be investigated and either reported upstream as a bug, > is temporary and we should just wait for it to resolve (e.g. packages > released out of sync with sources), or a real change that requires > an exception to be added to mirrorball config. This is not, normally, > a daily process. With CentOS, it isn't even every week; most of the > work is identifying new exceptions due to packaging changes at point > releases. But since Fedora allows more change, I see that this could > happen slightly more often. This is where I'd expect that Foresight > developers would do the normal diagnosis, with help figuring out > what to do in exceptional cases.
Ok, that doesn't sound too bad to me. >> I think I can dedicate some time a day, but unfortunatly all sas guys >> are still sleeping at that time. > > Working further around the clock isn't a bad thing. I imagine the > robot sending email to a team when things break. If you get an email, > you could investigate, and even if you haven't fixed it, you could > summarize what you learned in email to this list and the next person > could pick up from there. Yes, that infected me too, I pretty much was a mail guy, but foresight made me attached to irc. irc is fine, but we need to use ML more, especially if things should persist. Going back staring at Mirrorball source again to get a clue out of it :-D Btw. I forked your https://bitbucket.org/johnsonm/mirrorball-boots-config repo into https://bitbucket.org/Mark__T/mirrorball-foresight-config converted it to git and moved the different fedora versions to branches. I hope these configs are still a reasonable starting point. > This is where our too-IRC-driven culture has gotten in the way. Not > enough use of the mailing lists. It has not only made it hard for > those not always on IRC to follow what's happening, but has made us > look like we don't exist, because people look at the mailing list > and say that we're dead, because on the mailing list it looks that > way. -- Mark Trompell Foresight Linux Xfce Edition Cause your desktop should be freaking cool (and Xfce) _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
