On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:17:38AM +0100, Mark Trompell wrote: > Actually my poit was, if we already have our custom needfoo, which > depends on libfoo:rpm to build, > we need to take care that we change the buildreq to libfoo:devel. > So customizing dependancies of things already customized packages > depend on needs some extra care.
ah, yes, that's a problem if we really want to replace all uses of libfoo:rpm well, it looks to me that mixing encapsulated rpms with native packages may not be something we want and we should look into repackaging binaries as native conary packages as a next step. greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life hackerspace beijing - http://qike.info -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net foresight developer realss.com foresightlinux.org unix sysadmin trainer developer societyserver.org Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
