On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:37:04PM +0100, Martin Baehr wrote: > ah, yes, that's a problem if we really want to replace all uses of libfoo:rpm > well, it looks to me that mixing encapsulated rpms with native packages > may not be something we want and we should look into repackaging > binaries as native conary packages as a next step.
That's definitely more flexible, but requires a bunch of new work writing tag scripts, since the ecosystem has changed and the existing tag scripts won't be sufficient. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
