On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:08:06AM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:37:04PM +0100, Martin Baehr wrote:
> > ah, yes, that's a problem if we really want to replace all uses of 
> > libfoo:rpm
> > well, it looks to me that mixing encapsulated rpms with native packages
> > may not be something we want and we should look into repackaging
> > binaries as native conary packages as a next step.
> 
> That's definitely more flexible, but requires a bunch of new work
> writing tag scripts, since the ecosystem has changed and the existing
> tag scripts won't be sufficient.

can you elaborate on this?
is there other work besides writing tag scripts?

how do these scripts look like. can you point to some examples?
what's involved in writing such scripts? 

how can we find out what scripts are needed?

greetings, martin.
-- 
eKita                   -   the online platform for your entire academic life
hackerspace beijing     -                                    http://qike.info
--
chief engineer                                                       eKita.co
pike programmer      pike.lysator.liu.se                          caudium.net
foresight developer  realss.com                            foresightlinux.org
unix sysadmin        trainer           developer            societyserver.org
Martin Bähr          working in china        http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/

_______________________________________________
Foresight-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel

Reply via email to