On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:39:00AM +0100, Martin Bähr wrote: > we are talking about fedora language packs which > should be packages like any other, so separate rpms.
All I'm saying is that Conary doesn't have a feature that directly represents the language pack concept for anaconda, and the question is whether there is some group structure that could usefully encode enough of the information to be useful in practice. I do not see one, so unless someone proposes something, we'll just leave the langpacks out. Conary has no concept of a composite dependency, like "X depends on Z only if Y is also installed" but this is what a langpack essentially is. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
