On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:12:16AM +0800, Zhang Sen wrote: > Yes libgnome is already removed from gnome's build scripts, but it's in > _our_ recipe. When I _cooked_ glade, it requires me to install libgnome > things, but that's not actually needed.
you wrote that extra BuildRequires will lead to unneeded dependencies. but if libgnome is not in the build script it will not be used, and it will NOT lead to unneeded dependencies. if the resulting binary still depends on libgnome, then the build scripts still cause it to be linked, which means libgnome is not yet removed. is this the case here? do the binaries still depend on libgnome? does conary report libgnome as an unused BuildRequires? > Anyway this is no big thing, if there is no wonderful solutions, oh > well.. what kind of solution do you want? should the build fail for unused BuildRequires? that would just cost time. do you want an easier way to find the unused BuildRequires after baking all of the gnome dev kit? since there are hundreds of packages maybe you want a summary report? i guess this cold be done with a script. (how is the dev kit built? with rmake or cvc? are all packages built in a single rmake or cvc command?) greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world -- pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org open-steam.org unix sysadmin iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at caudium.org Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
