On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Alexandre Franke <alexandre.fra...@gmail.com> wrote: > [..] bugs that are filed by end users are rotting somewhere in our > bugtracker and these are the ones that we should check. Going > sequentially from older bug reported (lowest number) will ensure that > obsolete reports get closed or processed as they should be.
Here, here. I agree. To me, the lowest hanging fruit is to go back to the oldest stuff. Much of it is (probably) not even applicable anymore (e.g. who cares if epiphany 0.1 crashes when epiphany has been rev'd a bunch of times?). Furthermore, prioritizing has to be pragmatic. It's not a blocker that your obscure package that's not even in the groups is busted, but it's a critical issue if some part of GNOME that everyone hits is busted. --sgp _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
