On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote: > i have made some changes to fix a few missing items and get rid of > unwanted stuff. > > i remember you mentioned earlier that testing genmodel would be more > helpful if done on a fresh system.
I was thinking there mainly of a system that had been used for lots of real updates -- running it immediately after install is something I can easily test; I can do the same thing. Generally, small changes are going to preserve the overall complexity and re-running genmodel will still be useful. That said, António and Mihai have uncovered yet another issue that we are working to resolve, in which Conary cannot handle models that are of certain significant complexity (it runs out of file descriptors...) We are working on a patch to fix that problem. So you probably want to wait for that patch... > still need to figure out how to capture the email and forward it without > smtp access. would be nice if genmodel could dump the email into a file. It's just a multi-part email to sysmodel-rep...@rpath.com with a subject line "Conary sysmodel data report' that contains two attachments: * The contents of /var/lib/conarydb/manifest with the attachment name "manifest" * The contents of the generated model (/etc/conary/system-model or whatever temporary file it tells you it wrote) with the attachment name "model" Basically, if I run a script across the mailbox that filters into, I will be looking for those attachment names. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
