On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:36:29AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > i remember you mentioned earlier that testing genmodel would be more > > helpful if done on a fresh system. > I was thinking there mainly of a system that had been used for lots > of real updates
that's what my systems are, installed october last year and february this year. > Generally, small changes are going to preserve the overall complexity > and re-running genmodel will still be useful. i am still curious if the newer genmodel handles the issues i had to fix manually before. > Basically, if I run a script across the mailbox that filters into, I > will be looking for those attachment names. ah, ok i can assemble that manually easy enough. thanks. greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix searching contract jobs: debugging, programming, training and administration -- pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org foresight developer (open-steam|caudium).org foresightlinux.org unix sysadmin iaeste.at realss.com Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
