On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote: > yes, i am hitting that error on my machine in the office.
Sorry -- I've been trying to make genmodel more reliably build working models with this fix in place -- it has exposed some weaknesses in the simplification in genmodel. > is there an easy way to see all tracker issues regarding conary 2.2? Yes; you can use the "mercurial(2.2)" version, but in alpha we are not using issue tracking for most of this work -- Erik and I have been writing punchlist items for new development on his whiteboard. I do recognize that this is hard to see externally, but rITS isn't always the best way to support rapid innovation as we're re-inventing... So please feel free to file issues with "mercurial(2.2)" as the affects version, but we're just not going to take time to do that ourselves for every issue we run into. Once we are doing proper releases, we'll be transitioning back into our more normal model using rITS for almost all changes. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
