On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:22:10PM +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Michael K. Johnson <johns...@rpath.com> > wrote: > > search > > group-world=foresight.rpath....@fl:2-devel/2.4.9.1+2010.10.18-0.1-2[~!gcc.core] > > I wrote it as "search group-world=foresight.rpath....@fl:2-devel", > i.e. without the version. Is this good practice? I think this way I > can always get newest packages.
You can, and that will be precisely what happens. There is one possible surprise to be aware of. When we restart after critical updates with a system model, we re-run the model. So it's remotely possible that you update your system, including an update to conary, so conary restarts after updating conary. Meanwhile, new groups were already being built with an updated conary, and finished committing after your model was first run but before you restarted. So you rerun the model, and now there's a new conary. So you get another critical update and conary restarts again! We've never managed to hit this before, so I don't actually know for certain what would happen in this case. (That won't happen if you put in a version and use updateall.) I doubt you'll hit that, but wanted to make you aware. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
