This message is from the T13 list server.

> "Mcgrath, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/14/01 05:37PM
> ... As ... I keep on pointing out, 
> you're trying ... something that just is not needed.

Again I find your remarks consistently helpful, thank you again for your patience.

Maybe I've been having trouble distinguishing a claim that noone should care from a 
claim that people can't reproduce my results.  Please feel free to include technically 
redundant language to help me make this distinction.

> If the host is sending you more bytes
> than you should have for the command,
> then it is a bad host (as Hale would say).

I wonder if this English is slippery in exactly the right spot?

Let's try the example Scsi Cdb of x 2A 0 00:00:00:00 0 00:12 0 i.e. a write of the x12 
blocks at Lba 0.

If, out of band, the host and device have mutually agreed that each block contains 
x200 bytes, then yes only a Bad Host will move out more than x12 * x200 = x2400 bytes.

But now let's suppose the Bad Media refuses to let the device move more than 3 blocks. 
 And let's suppose our device, in Pio/SwDmw/MwDma modes, accordingly moves just 4 * 
x200 = x800 bytes and then stops the transfer.

If we change to use merely standard Atapi UDma, now we see a difference.  Rather than 
x800 of x2400 bytes moving out, when connected at UDma33, we see as many as x804 bytes 
move out.

To eliminate this difference, a device (here the receiver of clocks) can try to pause 
at block boundaries ... but unless the host cooperates, for example with a turnaround 
delay at block boundaries, in UDma more than x800 bytes will move out.

Here we see Change.

And Change Is Bad, for interoperability - for plug 'n play beyond the latest Windows, 
beyond the installed base of Windows, out into the wild world of the Windows to come 
and the things that aren't Windows.

> "Mcgrath, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/14/01 05:37PM
> Since our products don't suffer any of these problems,
> I'll leave it to others to carry it on from there.

Over Christmas I hope to work on vanity-publishing precisely how to demo how these 
issues arise with more and less direct Windows connections to an Ata hard drives.

I agree an adequate workaround for not counting bytes accurately is to accompany any 
inaccurate count with an ERR and to agree out-of-band that the count of data moved 
with ERR doesn't matter.

Pat LaVarre


Subscribe/Unsubscribe instructions can be found at www.t13.org.

Reply via email to