This message is from the T13 list server.
Andre,
I think it might be cosidered if it falls within the scope of that document. I
would need to study that more. I know both DCO and 48-bit stuff is ATAPI-6ish and the
1367D is ATAPI-4ish, so we should probably address them both somewhere anyway. There
are just some anomilies with HPA that would be nice to address in somekind of document
before we get to many differnent ways of doing things out there. If we can kill 2
birds with 1 stone (is it still PC to use that phrase) it would be better.
gkl
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Gary Laatsch
Cc: T13 (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [t13] Update of 1367D - PARTIES
Does it deal with the combination of DCO + HPA additionally?
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Gary Laatsch wrote:
> This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I was looking at document 1367D which is the PARTIES document and it doesn't deal
>with support of the 48-bit HPA stuff. Is there an updated document that I haven't
>found yet or did I just sign up to do something which will be brought up during new
>business in Vegas?
>
> Gary Laatsch
> Principal Engineer
> Mass Storage
> Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
> Office: 949-790-2107
> Fax: 949-790-2001
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Working code is good code, good code is not always working code...."
> - Craig Llewellyn (my first firmware manager) circa 1978
>
>
>
