This message is from the T13 list server.
Curtis,
I would say yes to that. I think at minimum it needs to be investigated and it
sounds from both my experience and what Andre is saying rev 2 is in order.
gkl
-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:05 AM
To: T13 (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [t13] Update of 1367D - PARTIES
This message is from the T13 list server.
Gary
I am not aware of any updates to PARTIES. The options are and
addendum, or a rev 2. It has been a while, so rev 2 may be in order. This
looks to me like the addition of one section. Would you like me to put
together a project request?
-----------------------
Curtis E. Stevens
Pacific Digital Corp.
2052 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92606
Phone (949) 477-5713
Fax (949) 252-9397
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB: www.PacificDigital.com
Never take life seriously... after all, nobody ever gets out alive!
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Laatsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Andre Hedrick
Cc: T13 (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [t13] Update of 1367D - PARTIES
This message is from the T13 list server.
Andre,
I think it might be cosidered if it falls within the scope of that
document. I would need to study that more. I know both DCO and 48-bit
stuff is ATAPI-6ish and the 1367D is ATAPI-4ish, so we should probably
address them both somewhere anyway. There are just some anomilies with HPA
that would be nice to address in somekind of document before we get to many
differnent ways of doing things out there. If we can kill 2 birds with 1
stone (is it still PC to use that phrase) it would be better.
gkl
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Gary Laatsch
Cc: T13 (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [t13] Update of 1367D - PARTIES
Does it deal with the combination of DCO + HPA additionally?
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Gary Laatsch wrote:
> This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I was looking at document 1367D which is the PARTIES document and it
doesn't deal with support of the 48-bit HPA stuff. Is there an updated
document that I haven't found yet or did I just sign up to do something
which will be brought up during new business in Vegas?
>
> Gary Laatsch
> Principal Engineer
> Mass Storage
> Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
> Office: 949-790-2107
> Fax: 949-790-2001
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Working code is good code, good code is not always working code...."
> - Craig Llewellyn (my first firmware manager) circa 1978
>
>
>
