This message is from the T13 list server.
There are issues of DCO + HPA + DCO(2) and whether an overriding issues associated with which feature is dominate. Cheers, Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Gary Laatsch wrote: > Andre, > > I think it might be cosidered if it falls within the scope of that document. I >would need to study that more. I know both DCO and 48-bit stuff is ATAPI-6ish and >the 1367D is ATAPI-4ish, so we should probably address them both somewhere anyway. >There are just some anomilies with HPA that would be nice to address in somekind of >document before we get to many differnent ways of doing things out there. If we can >kill 2 birds with 1 stone (is it still PC to use that phrase) it would be better. > > gkl > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:03 PM > To: Gary Laatsch > Cc: T13 (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [t13] Update of 1367D - PARTIES > > > > > Does it deal with the combination of DCO + HPA additionally? > > Andre Hedrick > LAD Storage Consulting Group > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Gary Laatsch wrote: > > > This message is from the T13 list server. > > > > > > Folks, > > > > I was looking at document 1367D which is the PARTIES document and it doesn't deal >with support of the 48-bit HPA stuff. Is there an updated document that I haven't >found yet or did I just sign up to do something which will be brought up during new >business in Vegas? > > > > Gary Laatsch > > Principal Engineer > > Mass Storage > > Phoenix Technologies Ltd. > > Office: 949-790-2107 > > Fax: 949-790-2001 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Working code is good code, good code is not always working code...." > > - Craig Llewellyn (my first firmware manager) circa 1978 > > > > > > >
