|
All,
In looking back through the minutes on this I
noticed in August 2002 (e02134r0 section 7.5.9) Curtis Stevens asked that this
be made manditory. The proposal adopted wasn't very clear other than it
provided for supported and not supported bits which I guess indicates
optional. ATAPI-7 clearly states it is optional (d1532r2 Vol 1 section
6.16.59). Did we loose something, the feature doesn't make sense if
it is optional does it?
gkl
|
Title: Serial # of an ATA drive
- [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Sridaran, Gana
- Re: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Gary Laatsch
- Re: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Andre Hedrick
- Re: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Gary Laatsch
- Re: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Gary Laatsch
- Re: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive James . C . Hatfield
- RE: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Evans, Mark
- RE: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive James . C . Hatfield
- RE: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Larry Barras
- RE: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Steve Gross
- FW: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Steve Gross
- Re: FW: [t13] Serial # of an ATA drive Hale Landis
