This message is from the T13 list server.
Curtis and Hale,
Also, to expand upon this. I think Hale's point is the proposal put
forth by Nita didn't contain the QUEUE FUA or QUEUE FUA EXT commands and he
was wondering where they were added or how they were proposed. My memory was
this was discussed and added at the June 2002 meetings. That is why I was
wondering if anyone else remembered these discussions. I remember
discussing all of this stuff (even Andre's comments about the FUA blowig
away the queue) but for some reason it just wasn't captured very well in the
minutes.
Gary Laatsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curtis Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "T13 List Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [t13] hmmm.. no comments?
> This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
> Hale
>
> I was there during the discussions and there was no secret committee.
> Basically, MS stated that they wanted to force meta data to the drive
> without blowing the que. This means that although it is possible to lose
> data, in their application data loss would not occur...
>
> ---------------------------
> Curtis E. Stevens
> 29 Dewey
> Irvine, Ca 92620
>
> Home: (949) 552-4777
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the
face...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hale Landis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "T13 List Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:57 AM
> Subject: [t13] hmmm.. no comments?
>
>
> > This message is from the T13 list server.
> >
> >
> > I'm curious why there are no comments about the question of the
> > origin of the WRITE DMA QUEUED FUA command (where is the proposal?).
> > And why no comments on QUEUED EXT commands with large sector counts.
> >
> > Is this because all these discussions must take place via the "secret
> > society"?
> >
> > Hale
> >
> >
> >
> > *** Hale Landis *** www.ata-atapi.com ***
> >
> >
>
