This message is from the T13 list server.


It turns out that during the last T10 meeting I discovered that I
have to pass the transfer length in the CDB. I have a was to do that, but
it is going to cost all the transfer bits. I will have a new command doc
out next week.
Two comments on T10/04-262r3:
1. My linux implementation also finds itself needing to be told
   the direction of DMA operations. I pick it up from SCSI
   housekeeping structures (which is where I also get the
   transfer length from.) If the direction of each transfer
   was explicitly stated in the CDB, I think it would be
   more self contained.

Well, TBH I think it's redundant information since libata (the Linux implementation, for our fair readers) already carries the data direction implicitly. I cannot see a case where the data direction is not available at all.

Vendor-specific & newly standard ops?

Pat LaVarre



Reply via email to