Jim Muehlberg wrote:
>
> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> >
> > At 02:08 PM 5/9/01 -0600, Jim Muehlberg wrote:
> > >I discovered that all of the locations where I specified "NO ERC" have
> > >netlisted together on the schematic.
> > >I'd call that a bug!
> > >
> > >Anyone else seen this?
> >
> > I haven't; but my guess is that if one of us has, he or she will also have
> > the answer as to why it happened. This is not normal behavior for No-ERC
> > directives, which should have no effect whatever on netlising. On the other
> > hand, if Mr. Muehlberg placed a net label called "NO ERC" on the locations,
>
> Just to clarify, I do not have a "NO ERC" net! Upon closer examination,
> though, not all of the no ERC points netlisted. Just a few did this.
> More erratic behavior if you ask me!
>
If the pins you have marked as "no erc" are connected to other things,
they will show up on the netlist, in the appropriate net. The "no erc"
flag just prevents them from causing ERC errors if they cause some type
of conflict - such as two output pins on the same net.
--
Peter Bennett
TRIUMF
4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada
GPS and NMEA info and programs:
http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
