At 11:15 AM 6/28/01 +0100, Richard Thompson wrote:
>Is it possible in protel to make a slit pad at all?  we need to insert some
>power transistors after flow soldering and on a cheap board cannot have a
>pealable mask on the solder side,  a slit pad would stop the pad covering
>with solder for ease of insertion.  I  used to just get the photoplotters to
>ammend the gerber info while using cadstar.

You can, of course, do the same with Protel -- either have the 
photoplotters amend the gerber or amend it yourself.

I don't understand the reference to a slit pad not covering with solder.

"Slit pad" in the usage I know refers to a pad which is circular but which 
has had segments removed from either side. The reference is to an original 
way of making the pads with crepe pads: one would slit the segements off. 
There were also decals made with slit pads, particularly for ICs. There is 
not a lot of reason to use this kind of slit pad over using a rectangular 
pad; an octagonal pad, if Protel actually supported octagonal pads instead 
of merely pretending to do so, would be similar.

Any pad shape can be built up from primitives in a Protel footprint. These 
primitives do not automatically assume the pad net; steps must be taken to 
cause them to do so. This would be a welcome improvement (automatically 
assigning component primitives in contact with a component pad the net of 
the pad unless to do so created a conflict (i.e., contact with more than 
one pad assigned different nets).

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abdulrahman Lomax
P.O. Box 690
El Verano, CA 95433

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to