On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> I was actually looking at Pure a couple days ago. (http://purecss.io) > Any opinions on that? > While i'm a huge jquery fan, this looks to be more in line with Fossil to me. OTOH, jquery is something all modern web devs know (i have yet to see/work on a web project the past 5 years which does not use jquery or a derivative of it). Caveat (minor, IMO) for both, though: modern CSS/JS requires a modern browser. purecss likely won't work well (or at all) in anything more than a few years old. jquery has an advantage there, in that they do a great deal of work to ensure compatibility (but also explicitly rule out older browsers in their newer versions): http://jquery.com/browser-support/ OTOOH, any given skin could include either or both or neither, so it's not necessarily an either/or choice. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
